MISTAKE IN ECONOMIC CRIMINAL OFFENCES
Autor/i: Vid Jakulin, LL.D.,
Stranice: 179-197
UDK: 343.229:343.37 ; 343.229:343.53
DOI:
Apstrakt: The article deals with mistake of fact and mistake of law with special accent on mistake in economic criminal offences. The author advocates the standpoint that we should differentiate between the effect of mistake of law in the case of acts of commission and acts of omission. The author advocates the standpoint that we should consider about the solution, that mistake of fact can exclude also negligence, at least recklessness. The author finds that on the one hand exists risk for erosion of law because of excessive “subjectivisation” due to admittance of the effect of mistake also for crimes of negligence, but on the other hand denial of this effect opens the door for strict liability. The author calls attention to the particularities of mistake in economic criminal offences and finds, that despite the differences between mistake of fact and mistake of law in the modern criminal law it is more important to differentiate between evitable and/or inexcusable and inevitable and/or excusable mistake than between mistake of fact and mistake of law.
Ključne reči: mistake, mistake of fact, mistake of law, criminal responsibility, guilt, intention, negligence, economic criminal offences, act of commission, act of omission.
Reference:
- Bačić, Franjo, Kazneno pravo, Opši dio (peto prerađeno i prošireno izdanje), Informator, Zagreb, 1998.
- Bavcon, Ljubo, Uvodna pojasnila h Kazenskemu zakoniku Republike Slovenije, ČZ Uradni list Republike Slovenije, Ljubljana, 1994.
- Bavcon, Ljubo, Šelih, Alenka, ostali, Kazensko pravo, splošni del, Uradni list Republike Slovenije, Ljubljana, 2003.
- Bele, Ivan, Kazenski zakonik s komentarjem, Splošni del, GV Založba, Ljubljana, 2001.
- Deisinger, Mitja, Odgovornost pravnih oseb za kazniva dejanja, GV Založba, Ljubljana, 2007
- Desportes, Frédéric, Le Gunehec, Francais: Le nouveau droit pénal, Economica, Paris, 1996.
- Dežman, Zlatko, Sprememba v strukturi krivde in pojem pravne zmote,v: Pravnik 51(1996) 4-5, str. 169-184.
- Foregger, Egmont, Kodek, Gerhard: Strafgesetzbuch, Kurzkommentar, 6. Auflage, Manzsche Verlags – und Universitätbuchhandlung, Wien, 1977.
- Korošec, Viktor, Slovenski prevod določb Hamurabijevega zakonika, Separat.
- Korošec, Viktor, Rimsko pravo, 1. del – splošni del, osebno, stvarno in obligacijsko pravo (druga izpopolnjena izdaja), Univerza v Ljubljani - Pravna fakulteta, Ljubljana, 1972.
- Kranjc, Janez, Glavna kazniva dejanja rimskega kazenskega prava ob koncu 2. in ob začetku 3. stoletja n. š. in kazni, ki so bile zanje zagrožene, v: Zbornik
znanstvenih razprav XLVIII letnik (ur. M. Pavčnik), Pravna fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, 1988, s. 23-42.
- Kranjc, Janez, Latinski pravni reki, Pravna obzorja, Cankarjeva založba, Ljubljana, 1994.
- Kühl, K., Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil , (2. Auflage), Verlag Franz Vahlen, München, 1997.
- Pavišić, Berislav, Veić, Petar: Komentar kaznenoga zakona, Drugo izmijenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje, Ministarstvo unutranjih poslova Republike Hrvatske,
Zagreb, 1999.
- Roxin, Claus, Strafrecht, allgemeiner teil, (2. Auflage), Verlag C.H. Beck, München, 1994.
- Višić, Marko, Zakonici drevne Mesopotamije, Svjetlost, Sarajevo, 1989.
- Zupančić, Boštjan Marija, Deontologija pravne zmote – Meje subjektivizacije kazenskega prava, v: Pravnik 42 (1987) 5-7, str. 305-320.
Legal sources:
- Kazenski zakonik (KZ-1), UL RS št. 55/08, 66/08 (popravek), 39/09.
- Kazenski zakon SFRJ, UL SFRJ št. 44/76, 54/76 in 38/77 (popravki), 34/84, 74/87, 57/89, 38/90.
- Zakon o odgovornosti pravnih oseb za kazniva dejanja (ZOPOKD), UL RS žšt. 98/04 (uradno prečišćeno besedilo), 65/08.