BASIC RULES OF APPLYING THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY OF ARMS IN THE MISDEMEANOUR PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Kompletan rad u pdf formatu

Autor/i: Mladen Jeličić,

Stranice: 57-72
UDK: 342.722:343.1
DOI:

Apstrakt: The author discusses the principle of equality of arms in the misdemeanour procedure of the Republic of Serbia. Following the introductory remarks, the basic characteristics of the misdemeanour procedure are indicated. The subject matter of the analysis is the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, which establishes this principle as the basic principle of fair trial. The author emphasizes the importance of the proper management of the misdemeanour procedure by the court by linking the principle under consideration with the principle of the party which requires legal assistance. The relationship between the said principle and the defendant’s right to a defence, has been analysed. The subject of interest of the author is also a specific institute - a decision without hearing the defendant. The author concludes that the application of the principle of equality of arms in the practice of misdemeanour courts must be grounded in normative frameworks and that this principle must be the guiding principle that obliges the court to resolve any doubts in the interpretation and application of law, bearing in mind the imperative of a fair misdemeanour procedure.

Ključne reči: equality of arms, misdemeanour procedure, right to defence, party which requires legal assistance, decisions without hearing defendant

Reference:
– Beitz, C. (2009) The Idea Of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. – Bošković, M., Skakavac, T. (2017) Misdemeanour Law. Novi Sad: Fakultet za pravne i poslovne studije “Dr Lazar Vrkatić”. – Delić, N., Bajović, V. (2018) Practice of Misdemeanour Law. Belgrade: Službeni glasnik. – Dimitrijević, P. (2001) Misdemeanour Law. Belgrade: Službeni glasnik, Savet za državnu upravu Vlade Republike Srbije. – Duranti, M. (2017) The Conservative Human Rights Revolution, European Identity, Transnational Politics, and the Origins of the European Convention. New York: Oxford University Press. – Đorđević, Đ. (2015) Misdemeanour Law with the Basic of Economical offences. Belgrade: Kriminalističko policijska akademija. – Đuričić, M., Bejatović, G. (2015) Misdemeanour Law. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosudje. – Falk, R. (2008) Achieving human rights. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis e-Library – Fedorova, M. (2012) The Principle of Equality of Arms in International Criminal Proceedings. Cambridge: Intersentia. – Greer, S. (2006) The European Convention on Human Rights Achievements, Problems and Prospects. New York: Cambridge University Press. – Griffin, J. (2008) On Human rights. New York: Oxford University Press. – Jakšić, A. (2006) Commentary of the European Convention on Human Rights. Belgrade: Centar za publikacije Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. – Jeličić, M, (2018a) Factual identification of misdemeanour. NBP Journal of Criminalistics and Law.23(2) pp.147-166. – Jeličić, M, (2018b) Management of the misdemeanour procedure. Legal Topics.6(12) pp.8-19. – Jeličić, M, (2018c) Principles of the help to a party which requires legal assistance in misdemeanour procedure. Legal Records. 9(2) pp. 223-238. – Jeličić, M, (2019) Impartiality of the Judge in the Misdemeanor Procedure of the Republic of Serbia. Towards a Better Future - Democracy, EU Integration and Criminal Justice (pp. 49-58). Bitola: Faculty of Law University “St. Kliment Ohridski”. – Mitrović, Lj. (2014) Misdemeanour Law. Banja Luka: Panevropski Univerzitet “Aperion”. – Mrvić Petrović, N. (2014) Deficiency of the Law on Misdemeanours. Choice of Court Practice.22(10). – Pihler, S. (2000) Misdemeanour Law. Novi Sad: Graphica Academica. – Schabas, W. (2015) The European Convention on Human Rights - A commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. – Summers, S. (2007) Fair trail- The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights. Portland: Hart Publishing. – Trechsel S. (2005) Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. New York: Oxford University Press. – Vasiljević, T., Grubač, M. (2013) The Commentary of Criminal Procedure Code. Belgrade: Savremena administracija. – Vuković, I. (2015) Misdemeanour Law. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet. – Vukčević, B. (2014) The Commentary of Law on Misdemeanours. Belgrade: Poslovni biro. – Vrhovšek, M. (2010) The Commentary of Law on Misdemeanours. Belgrade: Poslovni biro. – Xenos, D. (2012) The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention of Human Rights. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.