Customary Justice System and State Criminal Law: A Model of Reconciliation in Indonesia
Author/s: Pakpahan, Hatarto,
Pages: 81-98
UDK: 343.2/.7(594)
340.141(594)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.63.3.5
Abstract: Indonesia's legal landscape encompasses over 250 customary justice systems operating alongside the formal state legal framework, serving more than half of the population's justice needs at the local level. This study examines the development of an adaptive reconciliation model between customary and state criminal justice systems through a comprehensive literature review approach analyzing legal frameworks, academic publications, and empirical studies from five provinces: Aceh, Papua, Bali, West Sumatra, and Central Java. The systematic review analyzed 150 academic articles, 25 legal documents, and 30 case studies published between 2017-2025. The findings reveal that customary justice systems demonstrate significant advantages across five critical dimensions: social impact (community building and reintegration versus stigmatization and isolation), recovery orientation (relationship restoration versus punishment), economic efficiency (rapid, low-cost processes versus expensive, protracted procedures), rehabilitative methods (educational and transformative versus punitive approaches), and imprisonment management (prevention of detention versus prison overcapacity). The customary reconciliation mechanism employs sophisticated approaches through participatory dialogue, symbolic rituals such as peusijuek ceremonies, and continuous social reintegration processes. This research proposes a comprehensive framework for formal recognition of customary court decisions within the national legal system, including specific coordination mechanisms between customary and state courts, development of culturally-sensitive community-based justice programs, and establishment of check and balance mechanisms ensuring human rights protection. The adaptive reconciliation model offers practical solutions for Indonesia's multicultural society while addressing critical challenges in the formal justice system, including case overload, accessibility barriers, limited rehabilitative outcomes, and prison overcapacity issues.
Keywords: customary justice, legal pluralism, restorative justice, adaptive reconciliation, Indonesian legal system
References:
Adila, A. and Alexandra, S. (2025) ‘Implementation of Customary Law in Land Dispute Resolution in Indigenous Law Communities’, Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial, 3(1), 993-1012. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v3i1.2296
Al-Hakim, A. (2023) ‘Navigating Legal Pluralism: A Socio-Anthropological Analysis of Governance and Law in Multicultural Societies’, Journal of Judikaltura, 1(2), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.61963/jkt.v1i2.35.
Atotso, J. and Achar, G. (2023) ‘The Nature of Traditional Justice in Africa: A Case Study of the Bukusu People of Kenya’, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(87), 1001-1008. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7876
Bakri, M. (2024) ‘Customary Law and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights: Challenges in the Age of Globalisation’, Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 4(2), 144-150 https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v4i2.165.
Benda-Beckmann, F. (2001) ‘Legal pluralism and social justice in economic and political development’, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(1), 46-56 https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1759-5436.2001.MP32001006.X.
Botero, J. (2013) ‘The Three Faces of Justice: Legal Traditions, Legal Transplants and Customary Justice in a Multicultural World’. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3169450.
Bwire, B. (2019) ‘Integration of African Customary Legal Concepts into Modern Law: Restorative Justice: A Kenyan Example’, Societies, 9(1), 17 https://doi.org/10.3390/SOC9010017.
Dzur, A. (2003) ‘Civic implications of restorative justice theory: Citizen participation and criminal justice policy’, Policy Sciences, 36, 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:OLIC.0000017480.70664.0C.
Fatmawati, I. et al. (2024) ‘The Existence Of Customary Law In Domestic Violence Mediation: Harmonization Between State Law And Customary Law’, JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN, 10(2), 699-706 https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v10i2.7180.
Fauzi, R., Marpaung, W. and Prasetya, N.H. (2025) ‘Restorative Justice Concept in Islam & Its Implementation in National Criminal Law from Islamic Legal Philosophy’, JURNAL AKTA, 12(1) https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i1.43727.
Holzinger, K. et al. (2019) ‘The Constitutionalization of Indigenous Group Rights, Traditional Political Institutions, and Customary Law’, Comparative Political Studies, 52, 1775–1809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774347.
Indonesia, N.R. (2001) ‘Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 Tentang Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Papua’, UU No 21 tahun 2001 Otonomi Khusus, (September), 1–2. Available at: http://www2.pom.go.id/public/hukum_perundangan/pdf/Pengamanan rokok bagi kesehatan.pdf.
Ismantara, S. (2023) ‘The Urgency of Reconstructing Indonesia’s Justice System Towards Recognition of Customary Justice Institutions’, West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(04), 204-213 https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.318.
Kopong, K. et al. (2025) ‘The effect of the Application of Restorative Justice System on the settlement of Criminal Cases in Indonesia in the perspective of Customary Law’, Journal of Adat Recht https://doi.org/10.62872/05scdp40.
Madondo, I. (2023) ‘Accessibility, Independence and Impartiality of the Traditional Court System’, Journal of Law, Society and Development, 10 https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/12134.
Mansur, T. et al. (2024) ‘Challenges in formalization and documentation in Customary Court system in Aceh, Indonesia’, Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i1.230.
Oomen, B. (2014) The Application of Socio-Legal Theories of Legal Pluralism to Understanding the Implementation and Integration of Human Rights Law. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/the-application-of-sociolegal-theories-of-legal-pluralism-oomen/0e25108119945e249a37b62720b622f8/.
Ortega-Sánchez, R.I. (2023) ‘Conceptual legal analysis of restorative justice in Mexico’, Journal Public Economy, 7(13), 23-28 https://doi.org/10.35429/jpe.2023.13.7.23.28.
Pertiwi, P., Sakdiyah, F. and Rian, F.A. (2025) ‘Implementasi Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan: Studi Etnografis di Kawasan Hutan Adat’, Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 2 (4), 589-602. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v2i4.2231
Priambada, B.S. (2024) ‘The Urgency of Restorative Justice Regarding Customary Criminal Violations: Harmonization Between Customary and National Criminal Laws’, Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 22 (1), 847-862. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3514.
Shidiq, R.A. and Pulungan, S. (2025) ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution for Customary Land Through Customary Courts’, Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v4i1.517.
Suhariyanto, B. et al. (2024) ‘Reconstruction of Intersection the Customary Court and State Criminal Court for Indigenous Communities in Papua’, Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(2), 1107-1136. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v9i2.19155.
Suhermi (2024) ‘Restorative Justice in Customary Law: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Indigenous Communities’, Journal of Adat Recht https://doi.org/10.62872/nt54cz73.
Sukirno, S. and Wibawa, K.C.S. (2024) ‘Indigenous Land Dispute Resolution in Indonesia: Exploring Customary Courts as an Alternative to Formal Judicial Processes’, Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution. https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v6.i12.art09.en.
Swenson, G. (2018) ‘Legal pluralism in theory and practice’, International Studies Review, 20 (3), 438–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/ISR/VIX060.
Tamanaha, B. (2021) Legal Pluralism Explained. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190861551.001.0001.
Tanjung, M.A. (2024) ‘Legal Pluralism and Indigenous Justice Systems: An Anthropological Analysis’, Jurnal Ar Ro’is Mandalika (Armada), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.59613/armada.v3i2.2838.
Tobing, T.M.P.L. and Sufiarina, E.A. (2024) ‘The Implementation of the Acknowledgment of Rights through the Conversion of Customary Land Ownership’, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.802078.
Ubink, J. and Weeks, S.M. (2017) ‘Courting Custom: Regulating Access to Justice in Rural South Africa and Malawi’, Law & Society Review, 51 (4), 825–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/LASR.12298.
Untoro, U.Y., Umboh, N.K. and Fahlevie, R.A. (2024) ‘The Role of the State in Recognising the Customary Rights of Indigenous Peoples’, Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 9(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v9i1.4618.
Winters, M. and Conroy-Krutz, J. (2021) ‘Preferences for traditional and formal sector justice institutions to address land disputes in rural Mali’, World Development, 142, 105452. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2021.105452.