Prisoners’ right to healthcare and the practice of the European Court od Human Rights – What to expect?
Author/s: Kovačević, Milica, Atanasov, Saša
Pages: 47-62
UDK: 343.81/.83:614.2(4-6EU)
341.231.14:343.261-052(4-6EU)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.63.3.3
Abstract: Prisoners, as a marginalized and vulnerable group, must have access to healthcare. The protection of their mental and physical integrity and their human dignity depend directly on it. The right of prisoners to medical care entails numerous and complex obligations for the state. The aim of this paper is therefore to identify the main norms that bind European countries in the area of healthcare for prisoners. This study contains a systematic analysis of the relevant case law of the European Court of Human Rights. In order to ensure that prisoners' rights do not remain an abstract category, the European Court of Human Rights has specified both the nature and the scope of states' obligations in this area. The research findings show that setting binding standards in the area of healthcare is an extremely complex issue given the unequal resources and circumstances in different European countries. However, it is undisputed that the well-being of inmates must be taken into account, as well as the specific prison conditions, which have an additional negative impact on health. In particular, it should be borne in mind that prisoners should enjoy roughly the same level and quality of healthcare as any other citizen in the specific country. Authors conclude that states that do not fulfill their obligations to maintain and improve the health of prisoners violate their human rights. Zatvorenici kao marginalizovana i ranjiva grupa moraju uživati pravo na zdravstvenu zaštitu. Od navedenog neposredno zavisi zaštita njihovog mentalnog i telesnog integriteta, te ljudskog dostojanstva. Pravo zatvorenika na zdravstvenu zaštitu implicira brojne i kompleksne obaveze države. Otuda je cilj rada da izdvoji ključne standarde koji obavezuju evropske države u domenu zdravstvene zaštite osuđenih. Metod koji je primenjen podrazumeva sistemsku analizu relevatnih evropskih dokumenata i slučajeva iz prakse Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Kako prava zatvorenika ne bi ostala samo jedna apstraktna kategorija, Evropski sud za ljudska prava je konkretizovao kako vrstu, tako i obim obaveza koje države imaju u tom domenu. Rezultati istraživanja ukazuju da je postavljanje obavezujućih standarda izuzetno kompleksno pitanje, s obzirom na nejednake prilike u različitim evropskim državama. Ipak, nesporno je da se mora voditi računa o dobrobiti osuđenika, kao i o vrlo specifičnim zatvorskim uslovima koji dodatno negativno utiču na zdravlje. Posebno treba imati u vidu da zatvorenici treba da uživaju približno isti nivo i kvalitet zaštite, kao i ostali građani. Zaključujemo da one države koje ne ispunjavaju posebne obaveze u pogledu očuvanja i unapređenja zdravlja zatvorenika, zapravo povređuju njihova ljudska prava.
Keywords: prisoners, healthcare, human rights, European Court of Human Rights / zatvorenici, zdravlje, ljudska prava, Evropski sud za ljudska prava
References:
Abbing, H. (2013) 'Prisoners Right to Healthcare, a European Perspective', European Journal of Health Law, 20(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12341251
Augsburger, A. et al. (2022) 'Assessing incarcerated women’s physical and mental health status and needs in a Swiss prison: a cross-sectional study', Health & Justice, 10(1), 8. https://doi:10.1186/s40352-022-00171-z
Bell, E. (2022) 'Seizing the Populist Moment: Towards a New Penal Politics?', The British Journal of Criminology, 62(5), 1077-1092. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac030
Bosworth, R. J. et al. (2022) 'HIV/AIDS, hepatitis and tuberculosis-related mortality among incarcerated people: a global scoping review', International Journal of Prisoner Health, 18(1), 66-82. https://doi:10.1108/IJPH-02-2021-0018
Butler, A. et al. (2022) 'Prevalence of mental health needs, substance use, and co-occurring disorders among people admitted to prison', Psychiatric Services, 73(7), 737-744. https://doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000927
Charles, A, and Draper, H. (2012) 'Equivalence of care" in prison medicine: is equivalence of process the right measure of equity?', Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(4): 215–218. https://doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100083
Cloud, D. H. et al. (2023) 'Public health and prisons: priorities in the age of mass incarceration', Annual Review of Public Health, 44(1), 407-428. https://doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071521-034016
Đukanović, A. (2024) 'Right to Access Healthcare in Prisons: International Standards and Practice', In: Iljić, Lj. (ed.) Prison life organization and security: Criminological, penological, sociological, psychological, legal, and security aspects, Belgrade: Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, 256-276. https://doi:10.47152/PrisonLIFE.D4.5.13
Fazel, S., and Baillargeon, J. (2011) 'The health of prisoners', Lancet, 377: 956-65. https://doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61053-7.
Ginn, S. (2012) 'The challenge of providing prison healthcare', BMJ: British Medical Journal, 345(7875): 26–28.
Kovačević, M. et al. (2024) 'Motherhood in prison - challenges and perspectives', In: Ćopić, S., and Batrićević, A. (eds.) Prison Environment: A Female Perspective. Belgrade: Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, 65-78. https://doi:10.47152/PrisonLIFE.D4.7_3
Kovačevic, M., and Atanasov, S. (2024) 'Penalni populizam‒nastanak, razvoj i budućnost', Politeia, 27, 45-58. https://doi: 10.5937/politeia0-52787
Liebling, A. (2003) Suicides in prison. Routledge: London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203218365
Lines, R. (2006) 'From equivalence of standards to equivalence of objectives: The entitlement of prisoners to healthcare standards higher than those outside prisons', International journal of prisoner health, 2(4), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449200601069676
Lukić, N. (2024). 'Kazna zatvora u Srbiji – trendovi i odlike zatvoreničke populacije', Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 62(2), 135-160, https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.62.2.6
Nakitanda, A. O. et al. (2021) 'Hepatitis B virus infection in EU/EEA and United Kingdom prisons: a descriptive analysis', Epidemiology & Infection, 149, e59. https://doi:10.1017/S0950268821000169
Pękala-Wojciechowska, A. et al. (2021) 'Mental and physical health problems as conditions of ex-prisoner re-entry', International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(14), 7642. https://doi:10.3390/ijerph18147642
Spycher, J. et al. (2021) 'Healthcare in a pure gatekeeping system: utilization of primary, mental and emergency care in the prison population over time', Health & Justice, 9(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00136-8
Stover, H. et al. (2021) 'The state of harm reduction in prisons in 30 European countries with a focus on people who inject drugs and infectious diseases', Harm reduction journal, 18(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00506-3
Tadić, V. (2024). 'Inmates education as a function of developing socio-emotional competences', Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 62(1), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.62.1.4
Tomassini, L. et al. (2024) 'Drug overdose deaths during prison riots and mental states of prisoners: a case study', Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1377995. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1377995
Vandergrift, L.A., and Christopher, P.P. (2021) 'Do prisoners trust the healthcare system?', Health Justice, 9, 15. https://doi:10.1186/s40352-021-00141-x
Walter, K. S. et al. (2021) 'The escalating tuberculosis crisis in Central and South American prisons', The Lancet, 397(10284), 1591-1596. https://doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32578-2
Western, B. (2021) 'Inside the Box: Safety, Health, and Isolation in Prison'. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 35(4), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.4.97
World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) Health in prisons: Fact sheets for 38 European countries (No. WHO/EURO: 2019-3694-43453-61042). World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2023) Status report on prison health in the WHO European Region 2022. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Wozniak, K. H. (2014) 'American public opinion about prisons', Criminal Justice Review, 39(3), 305-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016814529968
Zhong, S. et al. (2021) 'Risk factors for suicide in prisons: a systematic review and meta-analysis', The Lancet Public Health, 6(3), e164-e174. https://doi.10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30233-4
Practice of the European Court od Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights. Aleksanyan v. Russia. No 46468/06 [Decision 22 December 2008]. ECHR 2008-I. §139.
European Court of Human Rights. Amirov v. Russia. No 51851/13 [Decision 27 November 2014]. ECHR 2014-I. § 84
European Court of Human Rights. Enea v. Italy. No 74912/01 [Decision 17 September 2009]. §§ 58-59.
European Court of Human Rights. Fedosejevs v. Latvia. No 37546/06 [Decision 19 November 2013]. ECHR 2013-IV. § 50.
European Court of Human Rights. Goginashvili v. Georgia. No 47729/08 [Decision 4 October 2011]. ECHR 2011-III. §§ 76-78
European Court of Human Rights. Holomiov v. Moldova. No 30649/05 [Decision 7 November 2006]. ECHR 2006-IV. §§ 117-122.
European Court of Human Rights. Hummatov v. Azerbaijan. No 9852/03 and 13413/04 [Decision 29 November 2007]. ECHR 2007-I. § 104, § 109, § 114.
European Court of Human Rights. Hüseyin Yildirim v. Turkey. No 2778/02 [Decision 3 May 2007]. ECHR 2007-IV.
European Court of Human Rights. Jeladze v. Georgia. No 1871/08 [Decision 18 December 2012]. ECHR 2012-III. § 44.
European Court of Human Rights. Kudla v. Poland. No 30210/96 [Decision 26 October 2000]. §§ 94-99.
European Court of Human Rights. McGlinchey and others v. The United Kingdom. No 50390/99 [Decision 29 April 2003]. ECHR 2008-II.
European Court of Human Rights. Mitic v. Serbia. No 31963/08 [Decision 22 January 2013]. ECHR 2013-IV. § 49.
European Court of Human Rights. Mouisel v. France. No 67263/01 [Decision 14 November 2001]. ECHR 2001-I. § 40.
European Court of Human Rights. Normantowicz v. Poland. No 65196/16 [Decision 17 March 2022]. ECHR 2022-I. §§ 89 -95.
European Court of Human Rights. Paladi v. Moldova. No 39806/06 [Decision 10 March 2009]. §§ 22-43, §§ 72-71.
European Court of Human Rights. Patrianin v. Russia. No 12983/14 [Decision 8 February 2014]. ECHR 2014-I.
European Court of Human Rights. Shirkhanyan v. Armenia. No 54547/16 [Decision 22 February 2022]. ECHR 2022-IV.
European Court of Human Rights. Strazimiri v. Albania. 34602/16 [Decision 21 January 2020]. ECHR 2020-II. § 109.
European Court of Human Rights. Testa v. Croatia. No 20877/04 [Decision 12 July 2007]. ECHR 2007-I. § 52.
European Court of Human Rights. Wenner v. Germany. No 62303/13 [Decision 1 September 2016]. ECHR 2016-V. §§ 75-77.
European Court of Human Rights. Zarzycki v. Poland. No 15351/03 [Decision 12 March 2013]. ECHR 2013-IV.