Anonymous witnesses in International Criminal Law
Author/s: Ranđelović, Višnja,
Pages: 31-46
UDK: 343.143
341.231.14
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.63.3.2
Abstract: Witness anonymity as a protective measure leads to a conflict between two rights – the defendant’s right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, on the one hand, and the witness’s right to protection. How witnesses before international criminal courts faced threats and intimidation, and their role in international criminal trials is important and indispensable, the question arises as to whether they should be granted anonymity in certain cases and under certain conditions. So far, in the practice of international criminal courts, anonymity has been granted to witnesses only in the Tadić case before the ICTY. Although other chambers of the ICTY considered the application of this protective measure, and the chambers of the ICC as well, anonymity was not granted to any witness. The main reason is that it is considered that the application of this protective measure is not in accordance with the rights of the defendant. Today, when examples of the use of anonymous witnesses can be found in the practice of certain national courts, which has been confirmed in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, their use in the practice of international criminal courts can be reconsidered. If the use of anonymous witnesses is allowed before international criminal courts, it must be a last resort and an exceptional measure. Strict conditions for its application must be met first of all, and a balance must be established with the rights of the accused, which are limited due to the use of anonymous witnesses. If the use of anonymous witnesses is not allowed, the consequence may be an acquittal due to lack of evidence, because witnesses refuse to testify out of fear, which has already happened in the practice of international criminal courts. The paper provides a brief historical overview of the use of anonymous witnesses, as well as a brief presentation of national solutions and decisions of national courts regarding their use. The protective measures provided by the acts of international criminal courts, which can serve as a basis for the use of anonymous witnesses, are analyzed. Various positions presented in the Tadić case before the ICTY when deciding on the use of anonymous witnesses, as well as some positions presented before the ICC, are also analyzed. Finally, some guidelines are provided that may be useful for granting anonymity status if this protective measure is to be applied in international criminal justice.
Keywords: victims, witnesses, protective measures, anonymous witnesses, right to confront, right to cross-examine witnesses, international criminal courts
References:
Amnesty International (1999) The International Criminal Court: Ensuring an Effective Role for Victims. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ior40/006/1999/en/
(Accessed: 25 October 2025).
Banović, B. (2009) 'Zaštita žrtava i svedoka pred međunarodnim krivičnim sudovima', Pravni život, 13, 1085-1101.
Banović, B., Milekić, V. (2014) 'Postupak pred međunarodnim krivičnim sudom - korak napred u odnosu na praksu ad hoc tribunala' Pravni život, 9, 631-641.
Chinkin, C. (1997) 'Due Process and Witnesses Anonymity', American Journal of International Law, 1, 75-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2954142
De Brouwer, A. M. (2015) 'The Problem of Witness Interference before International Criminal Tribunals', International Criminal Law Review, 15, 700-732. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01504005
European Court of Human Rights (1996) Judgment in Case of Van Mechelen and Others v. The Netherlands.
European Court of Human Rights (1996) Judgment in the Case of Doorson v. The Netherlands.
Falvey, J. (1995) 'United Nations Justice or Military Justice: Which is the Oxymoron? Analysis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia', Fordham International Law Journal, 19, 474-528.
Gajić, G. (2010) Zaštita svjedoka pred međunarodnim krivičnim sudovima. Banja Luka: Internacionalna asocijacija kriminalista.
Garkawe, S. (2003) 'Victims and the International Criminal Court: Three major issues', International Criminal Law Review, 3, 345-367. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181203322584350
Herrmann, F., Speer, B. (1999) 'Facing the Accuser: Ancient and Medievel Precursors of the Confrontation Clause', Virginia Journal of International Law, 34, 481-554.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (1995) Decision on the Prosecutor`s Motion Requesting Protective Measures for Victims and Witness, Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, IT-94-1-T. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002078290003237x
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (2008) Judgement in the Case of Prosecutor v. Haradinaj et al., Prosecutor v. Hardinaj et al., Case no. IT-04-84-T.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (1995) Separate opinion of judge Stephen on the Prosecutor`s Motion requesting protective measures for victims and witnesses, Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, IT-94-1-T.
International Criminal Court (2008) Decision on victims` participation, The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, ICC-01/01-01/06-1119. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020782900005702
International Criminal Court (2007) Joint submissions of the Legal Representatives of Victims a/0001/06 to a/0003/06 and a/0105/06 on the modalities of victims` participation in the proceedings leading up to and during the trial, The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, No. ICC-01/04-01/06-964-tENG. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000293000003774x
Jorda, C., De Hemptinne, J. (2002) 'The Status and Role of the Victim', in: Cassese, A., Gaeta, P., Jones, J. (eds.) The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1387-1419.
Kurth, M. (2009) 'Anonymous Witnesses Before the International Criminal Court: Due Process in Dire Straits', in: Stahn, C., Sluiter, G. (eds.) The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 615-634. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004166554.i-774.176
Le Roux-Kemp, A. (2010) 'Witness anonymity and the South African criminal justice system', South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 3, 351-370.
Leigh, M. (1996) 'The Yugoslav Tribunal: Use of Unnamed Against Accused', American Journal of International Law, 2, 235-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/2203685
Leigh, M. (1997) 'Witnesses Anonymity Is Inconsistent With Due Process', American Journal of International Law, 1, 80-83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2954143
Lusty, D. (2002) 'Anonymous Accusers: An Historical & Comparative Analysis of Secret Witnesses in Criminal Trials', Sydney Law Review, 24, 361-426.
Melaku, T. (2018) 'The Right to Cross-Examination and Witness Protection in Ethiopia: Comparative Overview', Mizan Law Review, 12(2), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v12i2.3
Momeni, M. (1997) 'Balancing the Procedural Rights of the Accused against a Mandate to Protect Victims and Witnesses: An Examination of the Anonymity Rules of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia', Howard Law Journal, 1, 155-180.
Ranđelović, V., Soković, S., Banović, B. (2023) 'International Criminal Law and International Criminal Justice Objectives and Purpose of Punishment in International Criminal Law Theory and Prastice', Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law, 1, 67-91. https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.61.1.4
Schabas, W. (2001) An Introduciton to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turanjanin, V. (2021) 'Anonimni svedoci i zaštita ljudskih prava', Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima EU, 277-296. https://doi.org/10.46793/upssix.277t
Van den Wyngaert Hon, C. (2011) 'Victims before International Criminal Courts: Some Views and Concerns of an ICC Trial Judge', Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 44 (1), 475-496.