THE ROLE OF NON-LETHAL WEAPONS IN PUBLIC SECURITY
Author/s: Erdem Eren Demir, PhD, Mehmet Ali Tekiner, PhD, Aybüke A. İsbir Turan, PhD
Pages: 59-75
UDK: 351.75
623.4.015.4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.60.3.4
Abstract: After World War II, “human rights” became a very vital issue all over the world, and with the publication of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations at the end of 1948, the subject gained an international status. In this context, the level of power to be applied by law enforcement officers in preventing the incidents and the equipment they use have started to be discussed. Equipment called “non-lethal weapons - NLW” began to be used in mass actions to end the incidents by causing less harm to both activists and third parties who were not involved in the action. The primary purpose of using NLWs is to minimize the severe human consequences during the intervention process to deter individuals from participating in the actions and to minimize the damage. Although it is called a non-lethal weapon, some negative consequences can be encountered due to the wrong or disproportionate use of this equipment, which can undermine the trust of citizens, who are not directly related to the events, in the state and naturally, the law enforcement forces, and the countries’ prestige can lose. For this reason, it is necessary to know and teach the issues needed to effectively use non-lethal weapons that give new capabilities to law enforcement officers. This study aims to examine the non-lethal weapons used by law enforcement officers to investigate the legal regulations on these weapons and their ammunition at the international and national level and to provide basic information on the types of NLW and their use. The scarcity of academic studies on non-lethal weapons in the national literature increases the importance of this study. As a result of the research, it has been determined that the main way of harming people and the environment as little as possible in the process of intervention in social events is the conscious use of NLWs by law enforcement officials.
Keywords: non-lethal weapons, chemical weapons, less deadly weapons, social intervention, non-lethal weapon legislation
References:
− Aydın, D. (2016) Toplantı ve Gösteri Yürüyüşlerine Müdahalenin Esasları. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 65(4), pp. 3283-3308.
− Barry, J. and Morganthau, T. (1994) Soon, Phasers on Stun, Newsweek, 123(6), pp. 24-26.
− Bedard, E. R. (2002) Non Lethal Capabilities: Realizing the Opportunities. Center for Technology and National Security Policy, National Defense University.
− Casey-Maslen, S. (2010) Non-Kinetic-Energy Weapons Termed “Non-Lethal”. Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law, pp. 1-86. https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Non-Kinetic-Energy%20Weapons.pdf, accessed on 12.02.2021.
− Davison, N. (2006) Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project (BNLWRP). Occasional Paper No. 1. The Early History of Non-Lethal Weapons. Bradford: University of Bradford, Department of Peace Studies.
− Deniz, İ. (2018) Silah ve Taktik Atış, Ankara: Polis Akademisi Yayınları.
− Evancoe, P.R. (1993) Non-Lethal Technologies Enhance Warrior’s Punch. National Defense, 78(493), pp. 26-29.
− Fidler, D. P. (1999) The International Legal Implications of Non-Lethal Weapons. Michigan Journal of International Law, (21), pp. 51-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383100184371
− Fidler, D. P. (2005) The Meaning of Moscow: Non-Lethal Weapons and International Law in the Early 21st Century. International Review of the Red Cross, (87), pp. 525-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383100184371
− Fischetti, M. (1995) Less-Than-Lethal Weapons. Technology Review, 98(1), pp. 14-15.
− Flint, A. (1995) They’re Shooting Not to Kill. The Boston Globe, (30), pp. 6-7.
− Grudowski, M. (1995) Not-So-Lethal Weapons. New York Times Magazine, 144(50152), pp. 40-41.
− Henckaerts, J. M. (2005) Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law: A Contribution to the Understanding and Respect for the Rule of Law in Armed Conflict. International Review of the Red Cross, 87, pp. 175-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638310018124X
− Hoffberger, E. (2017) Non-Lethal Weapons: The Principle Of Proportionalıty In Armed Conflict And The Right To Health In Law Enforcement. Zbornik
Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 38(2), pp. 831-853.
− İBB (2019) Özel Güvenlik El Kitabı, İstanbul: İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi ve İstanbul Güvenlik Anonim Şirketi, https://istguven.istanbul/my_piyanist_icerik /uploads/2019/09/ozel_ guvenlik_el_kitabi_01.pdf, access on 26.02.2021.
− Keskin, H.İ. (2012) İstanbul’da Meydana Gelen Toplumsal Olayların Değerlendirilmesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Adli Tıp Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Ana Bilim Dalı, İstanbul.
− Kleinig, J. (2007) Ethical Constraints on Taser Use by Police. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1(3), pp. 284-292. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pam037
− Koplow, D. A. (2005) Tangled up in Khaki and Blue: Lethal and Non-Lethal Weapons in Recent Confrontations. Geo. J. Int’l L., 36, pp. 703-808.
− M. Balali-Mood, M. Moshiri and L. Etemad (2014). Non-Ionizing Radiation, pp. 603-608.
− Mandel, R. (2004) Non Lethal Weaponry and Post-Cold War Deterrence. Armed Forces & Society, 30(4), pp. 511–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X0403000402
− Meron, T. (2000) The Humanization of Humanitarian Law. American Journal of International Law, 94(2), pp. 239-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2555292
− Salem, H., Katz, S. A., Feasel, M., & Ballantyne, B. (2014a). CN Gas. Encyclopedia of Toxicology, pp. 989–992.
− Salem, H., Katz, S. A., Feasel, M., & Ballantyne, B. (2014b). CS. Encyclopedia of Toxicology, pp. 1076–1081.
− Sheldon, R. D. (1999) Non Lethal Weapons, Non Lethal Policy, and Complex Contingencies. Naval War College, Newport USA, https://www.readcube.com/ articles/10.21236%2Fada363056, access on 10.03.2021.
− Ticehurst, R. (1997). The Martens Clause and the Laws of Armed Conflict. International Review of the Red Cross (1961-1997), 37(317), pp. 125-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002086040008503X
− TTB (2011) Kimyasal Silahlar Gösteri Kontrol Ajanları, Ankara: Türk Tabipler Birliği Yayınları.
− Tumbarska, A. (2017) Non-Lethal Weapons - A Concept Difficult To Define. Security & Future, 1(4), pp. 138-141.
− Tumbarska, A., and Petkov, P. (2017) Non-Lethal Weapons in the Context of the Restrictions Required by International Law. In Proceedings of Scientific Conference Actual Problems of Security (pp. 148-158).
− Türk Toraks Derneği, (2013) Göz Yaşartan Gazlarla İlgili Merak Edilenler, https://www.toraks.org.tr/news.aspx?detail=2387, access on 26.03.2021.