References:
− Carrera S., Stefan, M. (2020) Access to Data for Criminal Investigation Purposes in the EU. CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe, No. 2020-01. Brussels: CEPS. − Carrera S., Mitsilegas, V., Stefan, M. (2021) Criminal Justice, Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law in the Digital Age. Report of a CEPS and QMUL Task Force. Brussels: CEPS. − Corhay, M. (2021) Private Life, Personal Data Protection and Role of Service Providers: The EU E-Evidence Proposal. European Papers, 6(1), pp. 441-471 − Daskal, J., (2015) The Un-Territoriality of Data. Yale Law Journal, 125(2), pp. J 326–398. − Franssen, V. (2017) The Belgian Internet Investigatory Powers Act – A Model to Pursue at European Level? Europen Data Protection Law Review, 3(4), pp. 534-542. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2017/4/18 − Herlin-Karnell, E. (2012) The Constitutional Dimension of European Criminal Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. − De Hert, P., Parlan, C., & Thumfart, J. (2018) Legal Instruments used in courts regarding territoriality and cross-border production orders: From Yahoo Belgium to Microsoft Ireland. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 9(3), pp. 326-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284418801562 − Klimek, L. (2017) Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in European Criminal Law. Springer International Publishing − Krishnamurthy, V. (2016) Cloudy with a Conflict of Laws: How Cloud Computing Has Disrupted the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty System and Why It Matters. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2016-3. − Lenaerts, K. (2017), La Vie Après L’Avis: Exploring the Principle of Mutual Recognition (Yet Not Blind) Trust. Common Market Law Review, 54(3), pp. 805-840 − Mitsilegas, V. (2006) Trust-building measures in the European judicial area in criminal matters: issues of competence, legitimacy and inter-institutional balance, In: Balzaq, T, Carrera, S. (eds.) Security versus freedom? A challenge for Europe’s future, Ashgate: Aldershot, pp. 280–289 − Mitsilegas, V. (2016) EU Criminal Law after Lisbon. Oxford: Hart Publishing − Matić Bošković, M., Nenadić, S. (2021) Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Criminal Justice Systems across Europe. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), 5, pp. 263–290. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18307 − Mitsilegas, V. (2018), The privatisation of mutual trust in Europe’s area of criminal justice: The case of e-evidence. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 25(3), pp. 263–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X 18792240 − Stefan, M., González, G. (2018), Cross-border Access to Electronic Data through Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters: State of the art and latest developments in the EU and the US. CEPS Liberty and Security Series, Brussels: CEPS. − Suominen, A. (2011) The Principle of Mutual Recognition in Cooperation in Criminal Matters. Intersentia. − Tinoco-Pastrana, A. (2020) The Proposal on Electronic Evidence in the European Union, Eucrim, 1, pp. 46-50. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-004 − Tosza, S. (2020) All evidence is equal, but electronic evidence is more equal than anu other: The relationship between the European Investigation Order and the European Production Order. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 11(2), pp. 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284420919802 − Tosza, S. (2021) Internet service providers as law enforcers and adjudicators – A public role of private actors. Computer Law and Security Review, 43, 105614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105614 − Warken, C. (2018) Classification of Electronic Data for Criminal Law Purposes. Eucrim, pp. 226-234. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2018-023 − Willems, A. (2021) The Principle of Mutual Trust in EU Criminal Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. EU Documents − Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, of 13 June 202 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, OJ L190/1, p. 1-20. − Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention, OJ L 294/20, p. 226-246. − Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA, of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties, OJ L 76/16, p. 16-30. − Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition of judgements and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions, OJ L 337/102, p. 102-122. − Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA, of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgements in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union, OJ L 327/27, p. 27-46. − Directive 2014/41/EU, of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters, OJ L 130, p. 1-36. − Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA, OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89–131 − Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88 − Regulation 2018/1805 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders, OJ L 303/1, p. 1-38. − Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonized rules on the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering evidence in criminal proceedings, COM(2018)226 final. − Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters, COM(2018)225 final. − Commission of the European Communities (2000) Mutual Recognition of Final Decisions in Criminal Matters, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM(1999) 495 final. − European Council (1999) Presidency Conclusions, Tampere European Council 15th–16th October 1999, European Council. − Commission Staff Working Document – Impact Assessment accompanying the Proposal for a Regulation on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters and the Proposal for a Directive laying down harmonised rules on the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering evidence in criminal proceedings, SWD(2018) 118, p. 14. − Council Conclusions on the Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council: Resilience, Deterrence and Defence: Building strong cybersecurity for the EU, 14435/17, − Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the EU Security Union Strategy, COM/2020/605 final. − Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Digitalisation of justice in the European Union – A toolbox of opportunities, COM/2020/710 final. − 2020 Rule of Law Report – Country chapter on rule of law situation in Italy, SWD(2020) 311 final. − European e-Justice Portal, “Digital Tools in Member States”. − The Impact of COVID-19 on Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters – Analysis of Eurojust’s Casework, EUROJUST, 2021. − Non-paper: Progress Report following the Conclusions of the Council of the European Union on Improving Criminal Justice in Cyberspace, 2 December 2016, 15072/16. Caselaw − Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW v Leden van de Ministerraad, Case C-303/05, [ECLI:EU:C:2007:261]. − Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González, Case C-131/12, [ECLI:EU:C:2014:317]. − Minister for Justice and Equality v OG and PI, Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU, [ECLI:EU:C:2019:456]. − PPU Minister for Justice and Equality v LM, Case C-216/18 [ECLI:EU:C: 2018:586]. − Tele2 Sverige AB v Post – och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and Others Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15, [ECLI:EU:C:2016:970]. − Yahoo! Inc. v Belgium case, Hof van Cassatie of Belgium, 1 December 2015, case P.13.2082.N.