REGULATION OF REPRODUCTIVE CLONING AND INHERITABLE GENETIC MODIFICATIONS ON HUMANS - PERILS AND DEFICIENCIES

Complete work in pdf

Author/s: Anđela Đukanović, PhD,

Pages: 23-43
UDK: 349:602.72(497.11) 608.1:[575:612.6.05
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.59.3.2

Abstract: Harms arising from reproductive cloning or inheritable genetic modifications, for the time being, seem significant. This is supported by the simple fact that the first cloned monkeys were short-lived or by the fact that inheritable genetic modifications still carry a high chance of getting “off-target” results, which could result in serious health problems. Inheritable genetic modifications, in particular, have a high therapeutic potential, and it is suggested that this technology’s comprehension is shifting from an absolute ban, to concerns over safety issues. International law can prove to be facilitative when it comes to deciding which new technology should be prohibited, restricted or allowed, having in mind possible consequences and the so-called phenomenon of reproductive tourism. Legally binding regulation of both technologies has proven challenging at the universal level. However, there has been some progress in Europe on that matter. Harms arising from inheritable genetic modifications seem even higher than in the case of reproductive cloning, since they have the potential to affect the whole of humanity, including future generations. The Criminal Code of Serbia and the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia prohibit reproductive cloning. However, the prohibition of inheritable genetic modifications on humans is not regulated explicitly in the Criminal Code of Serbia, making this technology seem more acceptable or less harmful.

Keywords: inheritable genetic modifications, reproductive cloning, gene editing, human rights, criminal law.

References:
− Arsanjani, M. H. (2006) Negotiating the UN Declaration on Human Cloning. American Journal of International Law, 100(1), pp. 164-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/3518835 − Center for Genetics and Society, Human Genetic Modification, https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/topics/human-genetic-modification − Clados, M. S. (2012) Bioethics in International Law: An Analysis of the Intertwining of Bioethical and Legal Discourses. München: Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität. − Đukanović, A. (2019) New Eugenics in Light of International Human Rights Protection. The Review of International Affairs, LXX (1175), pp. 5–22. − European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2019) Opinion on Ethics on Geneome Editing, Opinion no. 32, European Commission: Brussels, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/research_and_innovation/ege/ege_ethics_of_genome_editing-opinion_publication.pdf − German Reference Centre for Ethics in the Life Sciences (2019) In Focus: Somatic Gene Therapy. available at: http://www.drze.de/in-focus/somaticgene-therapy − Ghose, T. (September 2016) World’s First ‚3-Parent’ Baby Born: Is It Ethical?, Live Science. available at: https://www.livescience.com/56299-three-personbaby-created.html − Hunter, C. (2009) Chimeras The Ethics of Creating Human-Animal Interspecifics. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität: Munich, available at: https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10022/1/Huther_Constanze.pdf (12.07.2020). − Jardine, J.J. (2018) The Law and Human Cloning, Knobbe Martens, available at: https://www.knobbe.com/news/2018/06/law-and-human-cloning − Jarrell, C. (2006) No Worldwide Consensus: The United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning“. The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 35 (1), pp. 205-232. − Kostić, J., Ranaldi, V. (2019) Criminal Sanctions For Cloning Human Beings. In: Ivana Stevanović Nikola Vujičić (eds.) National And Comparative Criminal Legislation Penal Law and Medicine, Belgrade: Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research Serbia. − Kuchler, H. (13 March 2019) Scientists plead for moratorium after designer babies outcry, Developers of Crispr technique for genome editing also call for halt to experiments on hereditary genes. Financial Times, available at: https://www.ft.com/content/468a1f16-45c9-11e9-a965-23d669740bfb − Labrou, C. (2012) The Use of Therapeutic Cloning in Transplantations: An Aristotelian Perspective. UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 1(1), pp. 63-87. − –Ledford, H. (19 June 2019) CRISPR babies: when will the world be ready? Nature, available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01906-z − Liu, Z., Cai, Y. at al. (2018) Cloning of Macaque Monkeys by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer”, Cell, 172(4), pp. 881-887 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018. 01.020, pp. 881–887. − Michalowski, S. (2004) Health Care Law, in: Peers Steve, Ward Angela (eds.), The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights –Politics, Law and Policy. Hart Publishing: Oxford, Portland. − Mujović-Zornić, H. (2007), Izazovi biomedicine: kloniranje i šta to znači za pacijentova prava, U: Rašević, M. i Mršević, Z. (urs.) Pomeramo granice. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. − National Research Council (2002) Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning, Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223962/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK223962.pdf − Navratyil, Z. (2013) Legal and Ethical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 54(1), pp. 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1556/ajur.54.2013.1.8 − Newson, A. J., Wrigley, A. (2017) Is Mitochondrial Donation Germ-Line Gene Therapy? Classifications and Ethical Implications. Bioethics, 31(1), doi:10.1111/bioe.12312, pp. 55-67. − Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2016) Genome editing, available at: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Genome-editing-an-ethicalreview.pdf − Ong, S. (2018) Singapore could become the second country to legalize mitochondrial replacement therapy. Science, available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/06/singapore-could-become-second-country-legalize-mitochondrial-replacement-therapy − Powell, R. (2015) In Genes We Trust: Germline Engineering, Eugenics, and the Future of the Human Genome. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 40(6), pp. 669-695.Doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv025. − Radišić, J. (2008) Medicinsko pravo. Beograd: Nomos. − Sigal, S. (2019) A celebrity biohacker who sells DIY gene-editing kits is under investigation, Vox, available at: https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/5/19/18629771/biohacking-josiah-zayner-genetic-engineering-crispr − Simović, D. (2008) Ljudska prava u Ustavu Srbije od 2006. - kritička analiza. U: Zoran Radivojević (ur.) Ustavne i međunarodnopravne garancije ljudskih prava. Niš: Pravni fakultet u Nišu, Centar za publikacije − Stojanović, Z. (2021) Komentar Krivičnog zakonika. Beograd: Službeni Glasnik − Strong, C. (2005) Reproductive Cloning Combined with Genetic Modification. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(11), pp. 654–658. − Škorić, M. (2007) Pravna regulacija reproduktivnog i terapeutskog kloniranja na međunarodnoj i nacionalnoj razini. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta Rijeci, 28(2), str. 1239-1267. − Thomson, H. (11 April 2019) First 3-parent baby born in clinical trial to treat infertility.New Scientist, available at: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2199441-first-3- parent-baby-born-in-clinical-trial-to-treatinfertility/#ixzz6yPfQHY3a − Van Beers, B. (2020) Rewriting the human genome, rewriting human rights law? Human rights, human dignity, and human germline modification in the CRISPR era. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1), pp. 1-36 https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa006 − Viswanathan, R. (Jul 28, 2018) 3 biological parents, 1 child, and an international controversy, Vox, available at: https://www.vox.com/2018/7/24/17596354/mitochondrial-replacement-therapy-three-parent-baby-controversy − Vogel, G. (2016) United Kingdom gives green light for mitochondrial replacement technique, Science, available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/12/united-kingdom-gives-green-light-mitochondrial-replacementtechnique − Winblad, N. Lanner, F. (2017) At the heart of gene edits in human embryos. Nature, 548, pp. 398-400. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23533 − Xinhuanet (30.12.2019) He Jiankui and other three defendants were prosecuted for criminal responsibility in the first instance of „gene-edited babies” case, available at: http://www.xinhuanet.com/legal/2019-12/30/c_1125403802.htm − Yotova, R. (2017) Report on regulation -the Regulation of Genome Editing and Human Reproduction Under International Law, EU Law and Comparative Law, available at: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Report-regulation-GEHR-for-web.pdf, 14.07.2021