MODERN APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE AUT DEDERE AUT JUDICARE IN ACTS OF TERRORISM AND TORTURE
Autor/i: Vesna Stefanovska,
Stranice: 43-58
UDK: 341.44:343.341
DOI:
Apstrakt: The maxim aut dedere aut judicare refers to the obligation of a state either to exercise jurisdiction over a person suspected of certain crime or to extradite the person to a state able and willing to do so or to surrender the person to an international court/tribunal with jurisdiction to prosecute such crime. The principle which has been postulated by Grotius in 1625 and subsequently laid down in a number of international conventions has a purpose to fight against modern forms of crimes and especially to combat against any form of terrorism and threats to the mankind. This paper will focus on the application of the principle of “extradite or prosecute” in acts of terrorism through several cases such as the Lockerbie case and the Habré case and lastly will discuss about the obligation of states to punish terrorist crimes or to transfer (extradite) persons to states for such punishment.
Ključne reči: aut dedere aut judicare, extradition, terrorism, prosecution, torture
Reference:
– Amnesty International (2009) International Law Commission: The Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute (Aut Dedere Aut Judicare).
– Amnesty International (2011) Universal Jurisdiction: A Preliminary Survey of Legislation around the World - 2012 update.
– Aust, A. (2005) Handbook of international law. Cambridge University Press.
– Bassiuoni C. (2008) International Criminal Law: Multilateral and Bilateral Enforcement Mechanisms – Volume 2. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
– Dugard J. and van den Wyngaert C (1998). Reconciling Extradition with Human Rights. American Journal of International Law Vol.92 No.2, pp.187-212.
– Enache-Brown.C. and Fried A. (1998) Universal Crime, Jurisdiction and Duty: The Obligation of Aut Dedere Aut Judicare in International Law McGill Law journal Vol.43, pp.615-633.
– Ferreira. R; Carvalho. A; Graeff Machry.C, and Barreto Vianna Rigon, P The Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare). UFRGS Model United Nations Journal, V1, 2013, pp.202-221.
– Garrod M. (2018) Unraveling the Confused Relationship Between Treaty Obligations to Extradite or Prosecute and “Universal Jurisdiction” in the Light of the Habré Case. Harvard International Law Journal Vol.59, pp.125-196.
– Grotius, H. (1625) De Jure Belli ac Pacis, Book II, Chapter XXI, section IV, Clarendon Press/Humphrey Milford, 1925.
– Harrington J. (2012) Without further delay – Senegal must prosecute or extradite Hissène Habré. Blog on EIJL Talk https://www.ejiltalk.org/without-further-delay-senegal-must-prosecute-or-extradite-hissene-habre/ accessed on 11.08.2018.
– International Court of Justice (2012) Questions relating to the obligation to prosecute or extradite (Belgium v. Senegal). Judgment of 20 July 2012.
– International Law Commission (2006) Document A/CN.4/572. Preliminary report, by Mr. Zdzislaw Galicki, Special Rapporteur.
– International Law Commission (2014) Final Report of the International Law Commission: The obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare).
– Joyner C. (2003) International Extradition and Global Terrorism: Bringing International Criminals to Justice. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Vol.6/1, pp.493-542.
– Keijzer N. (1982) Aut dedere aut judicare. Netherlands Reports to the XIth International Congress of Comparative Law Caracas 1.
– Kelly M. (2003) Cheating Justice by Cheating Death: The Doctrinal Collision for Prosecuting Foreign Terrorists – Passage of Aut Dedere Aut Judicare Into Customary Law & Refusal to Extradite Based on the Death Penalty. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law Vol.20 No.3, pp.491-532.
– Martinez L. (2002) Prosecuting Terrorists at the International Criminal Court: Possibilities and Problems. Rutgers Law Journal 1,18.
– Newton M. (2013) Terrorist Crimes and the Aut Dedere Aut Judicare Obligation. Vanderbilt University Law School – Public Law & Legal Theory. Working Paper Number 13-32, pp. 68-92.
– Plachta M. (2001) Contemporary problems of extradition: Human Rights,
Grounds for Refusal and the principle aut dedere aut judicare. Gdansk University; pp.64-86.
– Plachta M. (2001) The Lockerbie Case: The Role of the Security Council in Enforcing the principle Aut Dedere Aut Judicare. European Journal of International Law Vol.12/1, pp.125-140.
– Rapoport D. (2004) Four waves of Modern Terrorism – Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Great Strategy. Georgetown University Press.
– Shaw M. (1997) International Law. Cambridge University Press.
– UN (1929) International Convention for Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency.
– UN (1970) Hague Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft.
– UN (1996) Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind.
– United Nations General Assembly (2007) Draft Resolution Measures to eliminate international terrorism UN Doc.A/C.6/62/L.14.
– Wouters J. (2005) The Obligation to Prosecute International Law Crimes. The need for justice and requirements for peace and security, College of Europe, Bruges.
– Zgonec-Rožej M. and Foakes J. (2013) International Criminals: Extradite or Prosecute? Chatham House IL.BP 2013/01, pp.1-16.
– Zgonec-Rožej M; Foakes J; Kittichaisaree.K and Wilmshurst E. (2013) International Criminals: Extradition or Prosecution? Chatham House, pp.1-7